July 13, 2019

How my editor looks is important to me

This post at irreal laments the fact that people make such a big deal out of how their text editor looks, suggesting that it’s only the functionality that matters.

He quotes Vivak Halder

why should you ever care how your editor looks, unless you’re trying to win a screenshot competition?”

In general, I agree. What my editor can do and how it does it is what’s most important.

But there’s an easy answer to Vivak’s question: I care about how my editor looks because I stare at it all day. How could I not care deeply about how it looks?

There are many great reasons to defend Emacs, but appearance isn’t one of them. Dismissing aesthetics as unnecessary feels like defensive rationalization.

I’ve spent many hours trying to improve the look and feel of my Emacs experience, and I’ve gotten it to the point where, while no one would call it beautiful, it’s at least no longer aesthetically offensive.

I want the things I use and stare at all day to be pleasant. Emacs doesn’t need to be beautiful, but it does need to be nice.

Now, if I could only find a decent font and a light theme I don’t hate1.


  1. Please don’t say Leuven”. I would try and make my own theme but I doubt I could come up with anything I like, even if I was capable of making one.


Previous post
Sticking with Dropbox It’s fashionable lately to “ditch” Dropbox for other sync services. The reasons stated are usually around cost or privacy. This is understandable,
Next post
Org Super Agenda Org-super-agenda really helps wrangle the agenda view when there are lots of tasks. My config is so far pretty simple… Here’s a sample of what it